« FL: Broward-based Armor Correctional Health Services has Sheriffs Riding Shotgun | Main | Banned From the Barbershop: The Quiet Death of A Fighter for Civil Rights »
November 15, 2005
MA:House Vots to Allow Sale of Syringes--Gov. Romney May Veto Bill
House votes to allow sale of syringes
Foes see state encouraging use of drugs
By Scott Helman, Boston Globe
November 15, 2005
The Massachusetts House voted yesterday to legalize over-the-counter
sale of hypodermic needles to curb the spread of HIV and other
blood-borne infections, potentially setting up a political showdown withGovernor Mitt Romney over whether the bill will save lives or promote drug use.
The controversial measure, which would bring Massachusetts in line with47 other states that allow syringes to be sold without a prescription,has long been championed by public health advocates, infectious disease doctors, and substance abuse specialists, who argue that it would vastly reduce incidence of AIDS, hepatitis C, and the sharing of needles.
''This legislation is long overdue in this Commonwealth," RepresentativePeter J. Koutoujian, a Waltham Democrat and lead sponsor of the bill,said on the House floor. ''As soon as this legislation passes, it willsave lives."
But it drew opposition from several-dozen other lawmakers, who said thechange in state law would essentially encourage people to use drugs by making it easy for them to purchase needles at drugstores across the state.
The House passed the measure, 115-37, after almost three hours of
passionate debate. It now goes to the Senate.
Representatives of Senate President Robert E. Travaglini's office couldnot be reached for comment last night.
But Senator Susan C. Fargo, a Lincoln Democrat and cochairwoman of the
Joint Committee on Public Health, said she's optimistic her colleagues
in the Senate will approve the bill.
''I don't think people should be afraid of it," she said. ''I am
delighted it's moving forward."
The state Department of Public Health backs the bill, but Romney does
not, saying he believes that allowing access to needles will facilitatedrug use by addicts.
Romney spokeswoman Julie Teer declined to say whether the governor would veto the measure if it reaches his office.
''The governor has expressed his opposition to the legislation," Teer
said in an e-mail. ''When the bill reaches his desk, he will give it a
full review."
The bill would allow anyone 18 or older to purchase a syringe from a
pharmacy without a prescription.
It also would decriminalize possession of a hypodermic needle, which isa misdemeanor, and require pharmacists to hand out information about
treatment programs and about proper use and disposal of syringes to
needle-buyers.
Supporters cited a litany of statistics in making their case. Koutoujian said that more than 39 percent of all people living with HIV or AIDS in Massachusetts were infected because they or their partners used a dirty needle.
The state has the ninth-highest rate of AIDS infection by needle use inthe country, he said.
Supporters, who included several House Republicans, acknowledged duringyesterday's debate that the bill would not solve the problem of drugabuse in Massachusetts, which is particularly acute in urban
neighborhoods such as Charlestown and South Boston where heroin use is
high.
But the supporters framed the legislation as one important way to
address a public health issue that affects not just drug users but theirpartners, family members, and others in their communities.
''I don't know what the answer is to the war on drugs, but I do know onething," said Representative Eugene L. O'Flaherty, a Chelsea Democrat.''If one person can be saved by not getting hepatitis or not gettingAIDS . . . that's a pretty positive message to send."
O'Flaherty, who spoke at length yesterday about drug abuse in
neighborhoods he represents, was one of several lawmakers who said they initially had reservations about legalizing needles sales, but had been swayed after seeing firsthand how disease spread by intravenous drug use has ravaged lives in their districts.
Representative Brian P. Wallace, a Boston Democrat, explained that three years ago he would have thrown someone out of his office who suggested the state needed the bill. ''Well, we do need it," he said yesterday.''The kids who are dying in my community need it."
The bill is also backed by four district attorneys, including Martha
Coakley of Middlesex County and Daniel F. Conley of Suffolk County, who testified at a legislative hearing in the spring.
A representative of Boston Police Commissioner Kathleen M. O'Toole also testified in support of the bill.
Opponents said yesterday that the House was making a grave misjudgment.
''I cannot believe that the people in Massachusetts are listening to
this garbage that is being touted at this microphone," said
Representative Philip Travis, a Rehoboth Democrat, arguing that the
Legislature is effectively sanctioning drug use. ''My God, what does
this say to the young people?"
An answer was proposed by Representative Elizabeth Poirier.
''I wonder what kind of message we're sending to 18-year-olds and older,that it is illegal to use drugs, but it's perfectly all right to go inand buy a clean needle with which to do it?" said Poirier, a North Attleborough Republican. ''I think this is one of the most convoluted things I've ever heard."
But supporters say that every state but New Jersey and Delaware has
passed a similar law and that studies have shown a drop in transmissionof disease by needles. Connecticut and Rhode Island, for example, both saw transmission decline significantly in the years after they enactedsimilar legislation, according to Koutoujian's office.
A few communities in the state, including Boston and Cambridge, have
adopted needle-exchange programs to combat the spread of disease, but
supporters of the House bill argue the problem requires a statewide
solution.
Scott Helman can be reached at shelman@globe.com.
(c) Copyright 2005 The New York Times Company
Posted by lois at November 15, 2005 01:37 PM
