« Disparities Found in Sub-Prime Lending to African Americans & Hispanics | Main | New bill pushes for more, tougher mandatory minimum sentences »
April 13, 2005
War against Drugs or Youth--Ernest Drucker
Wednesday, April 13, 2005 - To the Editor of THE Berkshire EAGLE:-
As a homeowner in Great Barrington for more than 30 years, I have watched as the drug problems of the outside world inevitably surfaced in the Berkshires. But as someone who has spent his entire career doing drug treatment and related research (I am professor at Albert Einstein College of Medicine), I also knew that the many strengths of this community (caring families, good schools, community services for youth, and a wholesome environment) were its best safeguards against the most severe problems associated with drugs and young people. So even if kids experimented with drug and alcohol use (as over 85 percent do) I saw no cause for general alarm. That's because research clearly shows that most youngsters, especially those with sound family lives, move away from drugs when they mature. And as they "get a life," the vast majority of youthful drug users (even of harder drugs) do not have serious drug problems as adults.
But I also know that aggressive prosecution of the "war on drugs" can become a war on youthful users and do great harm. Naive and easy to ensnare, these kids are considered the low-hanging fruit by aggressive drug prosecutors. This is clearly the case with the 17- and 18-year-olds swept up in the Great Barrington drug bust.
Following eight months of "buy and bust" operations by undercover police, 17 young people are charged with school zone violations which carry mandatory two-year prison sentences, even for minor first offenses such as buying or selling a single marijuana joint within 1,000 feet of a school zone, although the school is nowhere in sight of the Triplex lot. This assures the maximum penalty.
If they are found or plead guilty (and even if they never serve a day in prison) the criminal record itself will cause exclusion from many forms of education and financial support, from the uniformed services, most public employment, and from many professional careers and licenses.
Recent research at the Boston University School of Public Health shows that such use of school-zone drug laws (originally meant to protect children from drugs when they attend schools) has no effect on drug use at and around schools. That's because most kids use, buy, and sell drugs close to where they live, which in many communities means within 1,000 feet of a school. So, not surprisingly, the BU study found that 80 percent of all drug busts fall within such school zones.
However, the study also found, most local police exercise judgment in charging school-zone violations, and most prosecutors "break down" or dispense with these charges in first offender cases. But not so in the Great Barrington case where DA David Capeless insists on these charges and the mandatory prison terms they imply.
Drug enforcement people often talk about "messages," but what message are the citizens of Berkshire County sending (via our elected officials) by so severely threatening these young lives in pursuit of some drug war illusion? In a world full of huge crimes and injustices that cry out for relief, should these kids' crimes be the focus of such vengeful adult behavior? Is that the message the adult community of Great Barrington wants their elected official to send to our children? Not in my name please!
ERNEST DRUCKER
Great Barrington
April 11, 2005
Posted by lois at April 13, 2005 09:32 AM